Autor/es
Descripción
ver mas
Colaborador
Izaguirre, Inés
Materias
Spatial Coverage
Temporal Coverage
1996-2002
Idioma
spa
Extent
355 p.
Derechos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 2.0 Genérica (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)
Formato
application/pdf
Identificador
Cobertura
ARG
1996-2002
Abstract
This research examines the physical-material and symbolic confrontations between the subjects involved directly or indirectly in six episodes of protest between the years 1996-2002. This period registered a rising social conflict and a deepening economic and labor crisis that affected the majority of the population of the country.
The dissertation analyzes public statements and interviews from the main actors of the protest/repression; published in the press during the period. In particular, the study focuses on the ways in which the collective actions of protest and the repressive practices of the State are defined.
This is a study of a field of dispute for the sense of the actions. The primary target will be to review what types of interpretations -constructions of knowledge- take place at these moments of high level of confrontations. Special attention is given to the processes of social stigmatization and criminalization, which occur precisely in those conjunctures when state repression is materialized.
The main hypothesis of this dissertation is that the interpretation of the conflict is the result of a relation between subject and object, which comes from a particular paradigm of understanding reality. This paradigm operates through ideological and morals valuations which condition the process of knowledge-construction.
The dissertation analyzes public statements and interviews from the main actors of the protest/repression; published in the press during the period. In particular, the study focuses on the ways in which the collective actions of protest and the repressive practices of the State are defined.
This is a study of a field of dispute for the sense of the actions. The primary target will be to review what types of interpretations -constructions of knowledge- take place at these moments of high level of confrontations. Special attention is given to the processes of social stigmatization and criminalization, which occur precisely in those conjunctures when state repression is materialized.
The main hypothesis of this dissertation is that the interpretation of the conflict is the result of a relation between subject and object, which comes from a particular paradigm of understanding reality. This paradigm operates through ideological and morals valuations which condition the process of knowledge-construction.
Título obtenido
Doctor de la Universidad de Buenos Aires en Ciencias Sociales
Institución otorgante
Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales